Residents in Buurhakaba stated that the ongoing clashes are intense, raising severe concerns over the district’s security situation.

As of now, there are no official confirmed details regarding casualties resulting from the fighting, including the specific number of fatalities or injuries, or the exact locations where the opposing factions engaged.

The reported clashes have heightened deep concerns regarding the security posture in Buurhakaba district and the immediate impact the confrontation could have on the civilian population.

Furthermore, it has not yet been confirmed whether the fighting has spread to other sectors of the district or if residents have been displaced from their homes due to the clashes.

This incident occurs against a backdrop of escalating political and security tensions across the Bay region linked to the governance and administrative dispute in South West State.

Kinetic engagements in densely populated urban centers severely endanger civilian lives and disrupt vital transport corridors.

Consequently, obtaining verified operational intelligence regarding the situation of civilians in Buurhakaba and their immediate humanitarian needs remains imperative.

The post BREAKING: Heavy Clashes Underway in Buurhakaba District, Bay Region. appeared first on Kaab TV.

State security forces were recently deployed adjacent to the residences of prominent opposition leaders, including former President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed and former Prime Minister Hassan Ali Khaire.

The National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) accused certain opposition figures of involvement in recent security incidents, while opposition leadership warned that troop movements risk provoking armed conflict.

The claims made by both sides have not been independently verified.

The primary strategic question is whether a politically and operationally viable disarmament framework can be executed at this time, given that Al-Shabaab maintains an active presence across parts of Somalia and numerous armed formations and security details remain aligned with various political factions.

Disarmament represents a formal security process aimed at reducing or collecting weapons held by civilians, informal militias, and non-state actors operating outside legal security structures.

It frequently serves as a component of broader Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration (DDR) initiatives designed to register weapons, disband irregular militias, integrate eligible fighters into formal state armed forces, or provide viable economic alternatives.

However, in the Somali operational context, disarmament extends beyond the technical recovery of arms from specific groups.

It is intrinsically tied to state capacity, public trust, central-regional federal dynamics, and mechanisms for political dispute resolution.

If a disarmament campaign is perceived as an impartial rule-of-law measure applied uniformly across all illegal weapons holders, it can strengthen state consolidation.

Conversely, if opposition factions perceive disarmament as a selective effort targeting them exclusively while leaving other armed entities intact, building trust and cross-factional cooperation becomes exceptionally difficult.

This dynamic is particularly critical in Mogadishu, where political-military friction directly impacts civilian security, commercial transportation, trade, and daily life.

A primary structural obstacle hindering a nation-wide disarmament campaign is the ongoing counter-insurgency effort against Al-Shabaab.

A report published by the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) in May 2026—evaluating security conditions between April 2025 and March 2026—noted that Al-Shabaab continues to control or exert significant operational influence across wide swathes of southern and central Somalia, retaining the capability to execute asymmetric attacks beyond its core areas of control.

This situation illustrates that the Somali government faces a dual operational challenge. On one front lies the ongoing war against Al-Shabaab, while on the other are internal security and political disputes among Somali factions. If state security resources and capabilities become consumed by internal political confrontations, serious concerns arise regarding the ability to secure territories liberated from Al-Shabaab and maintain security along critical transit corridors and major urban centers.

Conversely, the persistence of Al-Shabaab does not inherently mean that incremental disarmament measures are impossible.

The government can pursue lawful measures to regulate illegal arms within the capital while simultaneously sustaining counter-insurgency operations against the militant group.

The vital imperative is ensuring that such enforcement measures do not trigger fresh armed conflict that diverts security forces from primary operational mandates.

The June 2026 events in Mogadishu offer a clear example of the complexity surrounding this issue.

A report published by Reuters on June 5 indicated that clashes between state forces and armed groups aligned with the opposition caused gridlock and widespread disruption across parts of the capital.

The government subsequently stated that it had restored public order and disarmed the opposition-aligned groups involved.

The fundamental lesson derived from those events is that a ceasefire and a disarmament program are not synonymous.

Halting active hostilities can mitigate immediate casualties; however, unless underlying political disputes are resolved, standardized security protocols established, and a clear consensus reached on arms management, underlying tensions inevitably resurface.

Furthermore, disarming a specific faction outside the framework of a broad agreement trusted by all stakeholders raises serious concerns regarding impartiality and operational intent.

Such perceived selectivity heightens opposition resistance and severely complicates efforts to conduct peaceful arms collection.

The state bears the primary responsibility for protecting public safety, enforcing the law, and preventing illicit arms proliferation from disrupting national peace.

Where weapons are stockpiled outside legal authorization or an armed group poses an active threat to civilians, state security agencies possess a lawful mandate to intervene.

However, a strict distinction must be drawn between illicit weapons, standard arms held by state armed forces, and weapons deployed for the personal protection details of political figures.

Each category possesses a distinct legal status. The arms assigned to political protection details cannot be addressed without evaluating statutory provisions, threat levels, licensing frameworks, and the security rights of protected persons.

Consequently, disarmament measures executed against political opposition groups must not stem solely from political alignment or disagreement with the administration.

Any such program requires a transparent, codified legal framework applied impartially and subject to institutional oversight by competent regulatory bodies.

Should the government characterize an initiative as a public safety operation, it remains essential to provide public clarity regarding its legal foundation, scope, weapons registration procedures, and safeguards preventing the operation from degenerating into political intimidation.

Conversely, opposition leadership must clearly articulate protocols governing their security details and ensure those arms present no threat to the civilian population.

The foundational requirement is for the administration and opposition factions to convene a dedicated security dialogue isolated from broader electoral disputes.

This dialogue must explicitly define authorized weapon types, personnel entitled to carry firearms, permissible storage parameters, and the specific agency empowered to seize illicit arms.

The second step entails establishing a comprehensive arms registration system that categorizes official state military inventory, licensed VIP protection details, and weapons held by non-state entities.

Such a framework mitigates operational misunderstandings and prevents indiscriminate weapon seizures.

The third step mandates rigorous oversight and institutional accountability.

Disarmament operations must adhere strictly to statutory law, human rights standards, and civilian protection protocols.

Allegations involving operational abuse, property destruction, or unlawful detention require transparent, independent investigation.

Furthermore, national security strategy must not remain confined strictly to Mogadishu.

Given that Al-Shabaab maintains operational capabilities across broad swathes of the country, the government requires an integrated strategy linking urban center stabilization, transit route security, force augmentation, and administrative consolidation in newly liberated territories.

Without securing these areas, military gains cannot be translated into enduring national stability.

This imperative is reinforced by ongoing United Nations operations in Somalia addressing disarmament, demobilization, and community reintegration.

UNTMIS notes that it continues to support the Federal Government in formulating and executing an inclusive, human rights-compliant framework—specifically regarding the management of defectors from non-state armed groups, as well as Small Arms and Light Weapons and ammunition control.

If a disarmament operation is initiated during a period characterized by a mutual deficit of trust between the government and the opposition, several major risks emerge.

The respective sides may accuse one another of breaching agreements or weaponizing state security institutions to exert political pressure.

Should armed confrontations erupt, civilians bear the primary burden of casualties, particularly if engagements occur within densely populated urban quarters.

Another critical risk is the spillover of political friction into state security institutions.

National armed forces are required to operate strictly in accordance with statutory law, rather than fracturing along partisan lines to support competing political figures.

Should public and institutional confidence in their political neutrality erode, mounting a unified response to the nation’s primary security threats becomes severely compromised.

Conversely, if the government refrains entirely from enforcing measures to curb illicit arms, risks surrounding factional clashes and unregulated weapons employment will persist.

Therefore, the strategic imperative is neither to abandon arms control altogether nor to resort to force, but rather to establish a codified legal mechanism that reinforces security without provoking political instability.

Within the Somali context, localized or phased disarmament measures remain achievable in select sectors; however, comprehensive nationwide disarmament encompassing all armed entities presents an exceptionally complex challenge.

The persistent threat posed by Al-Shabaab, the proliferation of armed formations, ongoing friction between the administration and opposition factions, and the paramount necessity of protecting civilian populations collectively dictate that disarmament must be approached as a structured, long-term strategic endeavor.

The post Is Disarmament Feasible in Somalia While Al-Shabaab is Still Active appeared first on Kaab TV.

The reported movement of troops has raised questions among residents about why forces were withdrawn from areas where operations against Al-Shabaab had been conducted, particularly at a time when concerns persist over the security of recently recovered territory.

Reports that militants were active in parts of Middle Shabelle on Monday morning have added to the debate, although the details of the reported movements remain unclear.

The redeployment has also prompted speculation about whether domestic political tensions are influencing security decisions.

Somalia is facing disagreements over the electoral process and the future leadership of the federal government, fuelling public debate about the relationship between political priorities and military operations.

Some critics have directed their accusations at President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, arguing that the government faces mounting pressure over both the fight against Al-Shabaab and its handling of political disputes.

However, claims linking the troop movements directly to political calculations have not been independently established.

A statement circulating on social media criticised the president’s security record, saying: “Since the old man failed in the war against Al-Shabaab, he is now trying to reclaim his image as a liberator by liberating Mogadishu.”

The remark reflects criticism from those who believe the government should prioritise consolidating security gains in areas recovered from Al-Shabaab rather than returning troops to the capital.

They argue that withdrawing forces from contested or vulnerable areas could create opportunities for militants to re-establish their presence.

The debate comes amid broader concerns about Somalia’s security strategy and the government’s ability to sustain pressure on Al-Shabaab while managing political disagreements in Mogadishu.

The militant group has continued to pose a security threat despite repeated military operations against its positions.

Separately, videos reportedly shared by President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud have generated further discussion over complaints concerning the treatment of security personnel.

Government critics have linked the issue to the wider political tensions, although the specific circumstances surrounding the videos and the complaints require further clarification.

The reasons behind the troop redeployment, the extent of any renewed Al-Shabaab activity in Middle Shabelle and the connection, if any, between the military movements and political developments remain unclear.

The situation has nevertheless intensified public debate over security priorities, military deployments and the government’s response to Somalia’s continuing political and security challenges.

The post Mogadishu Political and Security Tensions Rise Amid Troop Redeployment Debate appeared first on Kaab TV.

According to a release issued by the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF), the incoming battalion is commanded by Colonel Michael Opio Ocuka.

Its arrival included orientation briefings from senior UPDF officers, who issued operational directives to the personnel prior to their full assumption of mission duties.

This rotation forms part of the standard force renewal process for Ugandan military contingents deployed to Somalia, ensuring uninterrupted delivery of the mandate authorized for African Union forces supporting national security and stabilization efforts.

The 48th Battalion Assumes Duties of Predecessor Unit: The 48th Battalion arrived in Somalia to relieve the 45th Battalion, which served among the active Ugandan contingents under AUSSOM.

Contingent rotation represents a vital mechanism for operational continuity, enabling units completing their theater tours to redeploy home while fresh units assume primary responsibilities.

This framework also facilitates unit familiarization with local security conditions, geographic sectors, and command protocols by leveraging operational handover knowledge from outgoing personnel.

The UPDF release did not specify the total troop strength of the incoming battalion, its exact tactical Sector deployment, or the precise date on which the 45th Battalion concluded its tour.

Consequently, those operational specifics await further confirmation from UPDF Command or AUSSOM mission Headquarters.

Brigadier General Jackson Kayanja Briefs Incoming Troops: The Commander of Uganda’s Contingent Sector One, Brigadier General Jackson Kayanja, urged the newly arrived troops to demonstrate strict discipline, military professionalism, and continuous operational readiness throughout their tour of duty.

General Kayanja emphasized that individual discipline forms the bedrock of a soldier’s success, charging the personnel to uphold the chain of command, respect superior officers, and foster unit cohesion and camaraderie across the ranks.

He further noted that the troops must embody discipline built on comprehension, sound judgment, and responsibility, rather than executing orders blindly without tactical awareness or due care.

The commander’s address highlights the high priority Ugandan military leadership places on force conduct, particularly when operating in environments characterized by complex security challenges that demand constant vigilance.

Emphasis on Interoperability and Vigilance: Brigadier General Jackson Kayanja also called on the incoming battalion to strengthen coordination, dedication, and joint execution during operations.

According to the commander, these elements remain vital for fulfilling the force mandate and mitigating security threats encountered by troops supporting Somali national stabilization.

Interoperability across different units plays a pivotal role in operational integration, tactical intelligence-sharing, and executing assigned mission tasks.

Likewise, continuous vigilance represents a core component of force readiness required for personnel deployed to high-risk operational sectors.

However, the published briefing did not reference any specific operations in which the new battalion has already engaged, nor is there any indication that the 48th Battalion has commenced direct combat engagements against Al-Shabaab.

Colonel Jude Rukubya Urges Adaptation to Operational Environment: The Deputy Commander of Sector One, Colonel Jude Rukubya, similarly counseled the incoming troops to rapidly adapt to Somalia’s operational climate and local security dynamics.

Colonel Rukubya encouraged the soldiers to remain eager to master new operational procedures while building upon the practical experience of veteran personnel deployed long-term in the country.

He emphasized the critical value of operational adaptability, learning from peer experiences, and executing mission objectives collectively.

Such guidance proves particularly essential for newly arriving contingents integrating into an international mission framework, as personnel must thoroughly grasp operational protocols, inter-agency coordination procedures, and the specific terrain dynamics of their assigned sector.

Adapting to the Somali operating environment further requires an understanding of local socio-cultural dynamics, seamless civil-military coordination with Somali security forces, and executing mission directives while prioritizing civilian protection.

Ugandan military leadership additionally underscored the imperative of Pan-African solidarity and a clear alignment with the core strategic objectives of the AUSSOM mission.

Uganda has maintained a sustained troop deployment in Somalia for nearly two decades, having served as a cornerstone of successive African Union peacekeeping iterations prior to AUSSOM’s launch.

The AUSSOM mission officially transitioned into operational force on January 1, 2025, succeeding the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS).

The current mission mandate focuses on bolstering Somalia’s defense architecture and developing the independent capacity of the Somali National Armed Forces.

As established in official mission frameworks, African Union contingents operate in direct support of Somali security institutions, reinforcing stabilization operations and securing high-risk operational sectors.

The concept of Pan-African solidarity highlighted by Ugandan commanders reflects the broader doctrine of African-led solutions to regional security crises, advancing collective peace and stability across the Horn of Africa.

For Somalia, the deployment of African Union forces remains governed by formal mission mandates and structural alignment with federal authorities and national defense institutions.

Uganda was among the first nations to deploy troops to Somalia as part of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM), which launched in 2007.

Since then, Ugandan forces have participated in numerous operations supporting security in Mogadishu and other regions across the country.

As AMISOM transitioned into ATMIS, and subsequently into AUSSOM, Ugandan troops continued their involvement in African Union security initiatives in Somalia.

A report published by AUSSOM in November 2025 noted that Ugandan forces contributed to stabilization operations, the protection of critical infrastructure, and the securing of main supply routes (MSRs) in areas including Barawe.

The report also highlighted ongoing operational coordination between Ugandan units and Somali security forces.

This data demonstrates that Uganda’s involvement extends beyond mere troop presence to encompass supporting stabilization and security operations executed within the framework of the African Union mission.

The rotation of the 45th Battalion and the deployment of the 48th Battalion reflect the continuity of Uganda’s military presence in Somalia and the standard force-renewal protocols governing participating units.

Such rotations remain essential for personnel management, mission continuity, and ensuring incoming troops receive comprehensive operational orientation before assuming command.

However, unit rotations alone do not indicate an increase or decrease in the overall strength of Ugandan forces in Somalia, nor do they signal changes to the mission’s overarching strategic concept of operations or geographic areas of responsibility.

The post Uganda Deploys 48th Battalion to Somalia, Replacing AUSSOM’s 45th Battalion appeared first on Kaab TV.

Reports from multiple sources indicate that forces belonging to the Darawish faction loyal to South West State President Abdiaziz Hassan Mohamed Laftagareen have increased their presence on the outskirts of Baidoa.

However, their precise location, intended destination and operational objectives have not been independently verified.

Some residents said military movements overnight appeared different from previous troop activity, heightening concerns about the city’s security.

Residents also reported hearing gunfire on the outskirts of Baidoa, allegedly involving government forces.

There has been no independent confirmation of where the shooting occurred, what prompted it or whether it involved a direct exchange of fire between opposing forces.

The reported movements come amid an ongoing political and security dispute in South West State, where rival factions have been strengthening their security preparations.

Previously circulated videos attributed to forces supporting Laftagareen showed armed personnel claiming to be heading towards Baidoa.

However, the footage has not been independently verified, and its recording date, precise location and the current whereabouts of the troops remain unclear.

Meanwhile, government forces and troops aligned with Sheikh Adan Mohamed Nur, commonly known as Adan Madobe, have reportedly been conducting their own military preparations in Baidoa and surrounding areas.

The reported activity comes as concerns grow over the possibility of a confrontation between the rival camps.

Adan Madobe is a central figure in the political contest over the leadership and administration of South West State. However, further verified information is needed to establish the extent of the government-aligned forces’ control over the city and the surrounding territory.

Additional reports suggest that Commander Adow Mohamed Abdi and forces under his command have joined the faction supporting Laftagareen.

The commander was reportedly previously associated with officers serving in the Eighth Battalion of the Somali National Army’s 60th Division.

If confirmed, the reported defection could affect the military balance between the rival factions. However, the number of troops under his command, their equipment, current positions and the potential operational impact of their reported move remain unverified.

The situation in Baidoa is likely to depend on developments around the city, the response of government-aligned forces and the political decisions made by the competing factions.

Continued military movements without efforts to ease tensions could increase the risk of clashes, potentially threatening civilians and disrupting movement within and around the city.

Residents are particularly vulnerable if fighting or gunfire reaches densely populated areas. Renewed clashes could also deepen insecurity in a region already affected by political divisions and security challenges.

Political dialogue and efforts to prevent armed confrontation could help contain the tensions.

For now, reports point to heightened military activity and growing uncertainty, but there is no independently verified evidence that a large-scale attack is being planned, that the reported forces are about to enter the city, or that a direct clash has taken place.

The situation remains fluid, and claims concerning troop deployments, possible operations and potential casualties require confirmation from reliable, independent sources.

Baidoa remains on alert as political rivalry and reported military movements raise concerns about the possibility of renewed conflict in South West State.

The post Baidoa on Edge as Military Movements Raise Fears of New Clashes appeared first on Kaab TV.

The shootout allegedly resulted in the death of a civilian and the injury of a Gorgor soldier, after which military officials intervened between the conflicting parties, and the situation is said to have calmed down.

According to information from the area, the conflict stems from a prior incident a few days ago at a checkpoint in Buufow Bacaad, where Gorgor soldiers encountered individuals transporting khat.

A similar dispute recurred in the area today and reportedly escalated into gunfire.

This incident comes at a time when Gorgor forces were recently deployed to Marka district and other parts of the Lower Shabelle region, highlighting the importance of maintaining relations between the military and the local community.

The Buufow Bacaad area is located in the Lower Shabelle region of southern Somalia, near the outskirts of Marka district, the regional capital.

Lower Shabelle is a region vital for agriculture, commerce, and the movement of people and vehicles.

The areas surrounding Marka also possess security significance as they feature connecting roads linking various parts of the region.

The geographic location of Buufow Bacaad means that local security conditions can directly impact residents, business owners, and traffic traveling between nearby areas.

The reported clash has therefore drawn public attention, particularly given that the dispute—which reportedly arose from a commercial issue involving khat—escalated into an armed incident.

Information from Buufow Bacaad indicates that days prior to the latest event, Gorgor soldiers stationed at the area’s checkpoint encountered a location through which khat was being transported.

According to local reports, the soldiers allegedly intended to take the khat, but were told that was not possible.

A similar dispute recurred in the area today, according to available data, and this misunderstanding reportedly escalated into an exchange of gunfire between Gorgor forces and the local side.

Reports from Buufow Bacaad state that the situation in the area later calmed down after commanding officers intervened between the conflicting parties.

This step reportedly helped de-escalate the tension and halt the clash, with the situation at the scene described as calm when that information was received.

However, it remains unknown whether a formal investigation was conducted to determine the direct cause of the clash or if measures were taken against those involved.

Likewise, it has not yet been announced whether the parties reached a formal agreement to prevent a similar dispute from happening again in the area.

Local residents may consider it important for the administration and security officials to clarify what happened and take measures to protect civilian lives and property.

This incident comes at a time when Gorgor forces were recently deployed to Marka district and other surrounding areas in the Lower Shabelle region, according to information from the area.

Gorgor forces are among the units of the Somali National Army and are utilized for various security operations.

The presence of government forces in regional areas is vital for security efforts.

However, the relationship between the forces and the local community also plays a major role in stability and public trust.

Any incident involving disputes between soldiers and civilians can raise concerns regarding military conduct, especially when events pertain to commerce, transportation, and goods moving along roadways or checkpoints.

Nonetheless, a general conclusion regarding all Gorgor forces cannot be drawn from this single incident.

It is important that what occurred is specifically investigated and the responsibility of the involved parties is clarified.

Security checkpoints manned by security forces are essential for maintaining security and safeguarding the movement of people and transport.

Therefore, the protocols governing goods and vehicles passing through those areas must be clear and avoid unnecessary disputes.

It is also important that commanding officers ensure that grievances and conflicts arising at checkpoints are handled in accordance with the law, avoiding the use of unnecessary force.

The post Clashes Between Gorgor Forces and Buufow Bacaad Residents Result in Casualties appeared first on Kaab TV.

The post Al-Shabaab Kills Civilians in Tardo as Heavy Fighting Continues appeared first on Kaab TV.

The post Jowhar Security Concerns Grow Over Rising Gang Activity appeared first on Kaab TV.

The operations were specifically conducted in the areas of Carfuuda, Bilcil-jabane, and Wadaariq, where local forces executed military maneuvers and screening procedures aimed at restricting the transit routes utilized by Al-Shabaab militants.

Reports from the area indicate that the forces blocked or severed several routes previously used by the militants for transit and cross-movement across rural settlements.

This measure has been described as an effort to stall the group’s mobility and prevent fighters from easily crossing between their strongholds.

The operational sectors occupy terrain crucial to southern Mudug transit networks, traversed by roadways connecting settlements such as Caad, Jowle, and Dabagalo.

Consequently, seizing control of these corridors remains vital for forces seeking to diminish the footprint of rural-based insurgents.

Prior reporting from the region demonstrates that Caad, Carfuuda, and Dabagalo have historically served as focal points for security incidents and clashes involving Al-Shabaab.

Somali ACLED data has documented numerous security occurrences throughout Mudug, prominently listing Caad, Carfuuda, and Dabagalo among them.

The Jowle area has likewise served as a theater for anti-Al-Shabaab operations over recent periods.

In May 2025, local forces in Harardhere district carried out an operation in Jowle, during which four Al-Shabaab members were reportedly killed, and several bases maintained by the group in the area were destroyed.

This indicates that the roads and settlements connecting Jowle, Caad, Dabagalo, and other parts of southern Mudug have long served as vital focal points for the movements of both sides. Forces attempting to secure the roadways

The ongoing operation appears to place primary emphasis on controlling transit routes rather than launching localized assaults against specific fortified positions.

Should the local forces sustain their presence in these newly secured areas, road blockades could severely restrict militant mobility and supply lines, especially if alternate rural pathways fall under government or allied control.

Southern Mudug has recently remained one of the critical theaters in the conflict pitting state and local forces against Al-Shabaab.

The European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) has noted that southern Mudug continues to serve as a pivotal zone for anti-Al-Shabaab operations, with state-allied troops and insurgents vying for control across the region.

The ongoing fighting and military maneuvers across rural Mudug have similarly impacted civilian populations, particularly pastoralist communities residing near Caad and Camaara.

In May 2026, local forces executed an operation in Borey, situated between Dabagalo and Warshubo.

Reports covering that operation stated that six Al-Shabaab members were killed, with local forces indicating that the offensive was launched following actionable intelligence regarding the group’s movements.

The newly launched operation in Carfuuda, Bilcil-jabane, and Wadaariq unfolds as anti-Al-Shabaab campaigns persist across sectors of Mudug.

Preliminary reports indicate that local forces aim to seize control of key roadways linking Caad, Jowle, and Dabagalo, in order to curtail the militants’ capacity to traverse these territories.

The operations are expected to continue as local forces attempt to solidify their footprint in the area, while Al-Shabaab retains a notable presence across parts of rural southern Mudug.

The post Local Forces Carry Out Operations in Mudug. appeared first on Kaab TV.

The post Al-Shabaab Reportedly Cuts Off the Road Connecting Hobyo and Harardhere appeared first on Kaab TV.